ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis) became covered by commercial insurance in 2014, with widespread adoption taking nearly a decade. This slow progression has created significant variability:
This variability extends beyond coverage, affecting how providers are trained and enter the industry. With no consensus on what constitutes "quality care," families and providers face a patchwork of inconsistent practices and policies.
Adding to this complexity is ABA’s controversial foundation. Developed by Ole Ivar Lovaas, early ABA methods emphasized strict behavioral interventions that have faced criticism over time. Today, there is a stark divide between “old school” proponents of these methods and “new school” practitioners who emphasize patient-centered care. At Camber, we see this tension firsthand, working as a coalition builder trusted to convene even those who may disagree with each other.
While ABA is the only commercially covered treatment for autism, this lack of diversity raises concerns. Autism is a complex, lifelong condition requiring multidisciplinary care, yet families often have only one insurance-covered option. This contributes to growing distrust among providers and parents. Emerging treatments, like MeRT (Magnetic e-Resonance Therapy) or private therapies, highlight innovation but exacerbate accessibility challenges.
On the legislative side, however, autism care is a rare bipartisan success. Autism services are universally recognized as medically necessary, a consensus that transcends political divides. Recent legislation, such as the renewal of Autism Cares ACT during the final days of the Biden administration, underscores this commitment.
ABA’s growth has led to a young, rapidly expanding workforce:
This rapid growth means many practitioners are inexperienced and poorly trained, creating a “blind leading the blind” dynamic. Combined with rising autism prevalence (1 in 36 children diagnosed, with increasing awareness and education per CDC), providers face burnout and high turnover.
Rates are another critical issue. Payment variability across state, national, and federal payers adds complexity: